Key result
Racial minority status linked to ~270% higher odds of underestimating CVD risk in reproductive-age women.
Why the study?
CVD awareness has declined among women of reproductive age, and risk underestimation may impede prevention efforts during this critical life stage.
What are the predictors of discordance between perceived cardiovascular risk and actual cardiovascular health in women of reproductive age?
Cross-Sectional (n=139)
What are the predictors of discordance between perceived cardiovascular risk and actual cardiovascular health in women of reproductive age?
Odds Ratio: 3.7 (95% CI 1.58–8.68)
Over half of women of reproductive age underestimate their CVD and stroke risk, with racial/ethnic minority status and medium polysocial risk being significant predictors of this underestimation.
Suggests need for culturally tailored risk communication in minority women; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the leading cause of death among women, yet awareness has declined significantly among women of reproductive age. Risk underestimation may impede prevention efforts during this critical life stage. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of the study were to evaluate concordance between perceived CVD and stroke risk and LE8-defined cardiovascular health status and to examine predictors of risk-cardiovascular health discordance among women of reproductive age. METHODS: Cross-sectional study of 139 women aged 18 to 50 years in the Baltimore/Washington DC area. Participants assessed perceived CVD and stroke risk using 7-point Likert scales. Discordance was defined by cross-classifying perceived risk relative to peers with LE8-defined cardiovascular health status. Multivariable logistic regression examined predictors of underestimation. RESULTS: Among 139 women (mean age 32.01 years), over half underestimated both CVD (56.8%) and stroke (58.3%) risk. In multivariable models, racial/ethnic minority status was significantly associated with underestimation of both CVD (OR: 3.70; 95% CI: 1.58-8.68) and stroke risk (OR: 3.29; 95% CI: 1.44-7.51), as was medium polysocial risk (CVD: OR: 2.72; 95% CI: 1.02-7.24; stroke: OR: 2.70; 95% CI: 1.04-7.02). Low cardiovascular health literacy (OR: 5.91; 95% CI: 1.05-33.31) and older reproductive age (≥32 years; OR: 2.26; 95% CI: 1.02-5.00) were additionally associated with CVD risk underestimation. CONCLUSIONS: CVD and stroke risk underestimation is prevalent among women of reproductive age with marked racial and social disparities. Targeted, culturally sensitive risk communication strategies are needed to improve CVD and stroke risk perception accuracy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stanislas et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiovascular disease and stroke risk perception (n=139). Racial/ethnic minority status vs. Non-minority status was evaluated on Underestimation of CVD risk (OR 3.70, 95% CI 1.58-8.68). Racial/ethnic minority status was significantly associated with underestimation of CVD risk (OR 3.70; 95% CI 1.58-8.68) and stroke risk (OR 3.29; 95% CI 1.44-7.51) among women of reproductive age.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: