Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Shows improved detail preservation in depth completion, indicating better structural consistency.
Depth completion densifies sparse metric depth (e.g., LiDAR or 3D light-field sensors) into a full map guided by RGB, yet many methods oversmooth thin structures and occlusion boundaries. HiFi-DC is a zero-shot test-time optimization framework that refines an image-conditional latent diffusion prior under three coupled in-loop constraints: (i) weighted least-squares affine metric anchoring to sparse samples, (ii) confidence-weighted sparse supervision to reduce sensitivity to isolated or noisy observations, and (iii) convergence-aware multi-scale normal guidance to encourage structural consistency while avoiding premature over-regularization. A progressive low-to-high-resolution schedule further reduces runtime and allocates late denoising steps to edge refinement. We evaluate HiFi-DC on eight benchmarks (NYU-Depth V2, VOID, KITTI, Hypersim, InteriorNet, MPI-Sintel, ICL-NUIM, and Virtual KITTI 2) using RMSE, MAE, δ 1 , SSIM, and depth-boundary error (DBE). On synthetic datasets with dense and geometrically accurate ground truth, HiFi-DC reduces RMSE by up to 24% and MAE by up to 18% relative to Marigold-DC (e.g., Hypersim RMSE 0 . 698 → 0 . 528 , MAE 0 . 564 → 0 . 463 ), while also improving SSIM and DBE. On real-sensor datasets with sparse or imperfect labels, performance remains competitive in RMSE/MAE, although the benefit of edge-aware refinement is more benchmark-dependent. Overall, the results show that combining metric anchoring and convergence-aware geometric guidance within a frozen diffusion prior can improve detail-preserving depth completion, especially when the supervision is geometrically reliable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vodianyk et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: