Evaluates multi-channel calibration for microphone arrays, suggesting improved accuracy.
For microphone arrays, conventional calibration procedures typically characterize microphones individually. However, this component-level approach often neglects the influence of the array structure itself, leading to systematic errors when the microphones are operated as a complete array system. This study evaluates two free-field substitution calibration strategies for a digital MEMS array. The first is the standard substitution method, based on IEC 61094-8, in which each microphone is calibrated individually at a fixed position using the reference microphone. The second is a proposed multi-channel calibration strategy using an array related transfer function (ARTF). By utilizing numerical models to correct for non-planar wave incidence and geometric mismatches, the multi-channel method enables the concurrent characterization of all array elements. For the on-axis free-field calibration case, the method agrees with the sequential benchmark within 0.3 dB, while phase calibration is evaluated as relative inter-channel calibration with respect to a designated reference channel. Model-based directional-response analysis further estimates that, at high frequencies, the diffuse-field sensitivity can differ from the on-axis free-field sensitivity by about 0.5 dB, while directional scattering can exceed 2 dB for rear-incident sound. These results support ARTF-based calibration as a practical on-axis system-level approach for digital MEMS arrays and show the importance of matching the sensitivity definition to the application environment of microphone arrays.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xia et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: