Cross-sectional study evaluates awareness and detection of AI misinformation in health professions students, highlighting educational gaps.
Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly used in health care and medical education; however, concerns persist regarding health professions students’ ability to evaluate the accuracy of AI-generated medical content, particularly when such content contains misinformation. Objectives: This study assessed the awareness, attitudes, and ability of health professions students in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, to detect AI-generated misinformation in medical contexts. Methodology: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 354 health professions students using a structured online questionnaire. The survey captured demographics, AI usage patterns, awareness of AI concepts, verification behaviors, and the ability to identify inaccurate AI-generated statements. Descriptive and inferential analyses were performed. Results: Most students reported prior use of AI tools (86.7%), yet only half (50.0%) were aware of the term AI hallucination. A large proportion (77.7%) had previously encountered wrong or confusing AI-generated information. Despite this, only 37.9% consistently verified AI outputs using other sources. Performance on the hallucination-detection items revealed substantial gaps: only 25.1% correctly identified the false statement that magnetic resonance imaging uses ionizing radiation, 40.1% correctly recognized that vitamin C does not prevent the common cold, and 54.1% correctly affirmed the aspirin–Reye’s syndrome association. While attitudes toward AI were generally positive – with 89.3% agreeing it is a useful educational tool – significant limitations in critical appraisal skills were evident. Conclusion: Health professions students in Riyadh are active users of AI technologies but demonstrate limited ability to detect AI-generated medical misinformation. Given the high reliance on AI for academic and clinical learning, these findings highlight an urgent need to integrate structured AI literacy, critical appraisal training, and misinformation-detection exercises into health professions curricula to promote safe and responsible use of AI in healthcare.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elabbasy et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: