Evaluates validity of Farsi SLUMS in cognitive testing, suggesting its utility for dementia detection.
Introduction: This study evaluated the psychometric properties of the Farsi version of the Saint Louis University Mental Status (SLUMS) examination, marking the first such investigation. Methods: The sample comprised 200 participants: 75 with normal cognition, 74 with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and 51 with dementia. Concurrent validity was assessed using the MMSE and NUCOG; divergent validity employed the GDS-15. Results: Exploratory factor analysis showed a unidimensional structure. Internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = .719) and test–retest reliability (ICC = .717) were satisfactory. SLUMS correlated highly with MMSE (r = .787) and NUCOG (r = .861), but moderately with GDS-15 (r = -.376). It effectively discriminated dementia from MCI but showed limited ability to differentiate normal cognition from MCI. Conclusion: The Persian SLUMS is a suitable screening tool for detecting dementia, though caution is advised when distinguishing MCI from normal cognition.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Faghani et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: