Randomized trial evaluates quantization stability in agricultural AI models, suggesting optimization strategies are critical for accuracy.
Reliable edge deployment in agricultural computer vision is often hindered by accuracy degradation during model compression. This study presents a systematic audit of a 14,154-image wheat disease dataset and identifies 11.6% cross-split data leakage using perceptual hashing (pHash) and MD5 verification techniques. Three modern image classification architectures—ConvNeXt-Tiny, ResNet50, and MobileNetV3-Large—were evaluated under multiple quantization and deployment backends. Results reveal substantial performance variability across optimization strategies. CPU-based dynamic quantization using ONNX Runtime caused severe degradation in MobileNetV3-Large accuracy (85.53% to 31.04%), whereas entropy-calibrated static quantization with TensorRT restored performance to 82.54%. These findings indicate that quantization instability is strongly influenced by deployment backend selection and calibration methodology rather than being an inherent limitation of a given architecture. While ConvNeXt-Tiny achieved the highest predictive accuracy overall, MobileNetV3-Large demonstrated strong deployment efficiency when optimized with TensorRT, achieving 54.5 FPS on constrained edge hardware. This work contributes a reproducible benchmark for evaluating quantized agricultural computer vision models and highlights the importance of data integrity auditing and deployment-aware optimization in edge AI systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aditya Raut (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: