Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates a QTT interpretation of the Aharonov-Bohm effect and its implications for electromagnetic and gravitational phases.
Artian Holonomy and the Aharonov-Bohm Effect Version: 1.0Author: Ali AttarWebsite: quantumtraction.orgMain book: 10.5281/zenodo.17527179 This paper gives a Quantum Traction Theory (QTT) source-access interpretation of the Aharonov-Bohm effect. Electromagnetic AB is treated as A4 real \(J\)-dial holonomy: the gauge potential is the dial connection, the Wilson loop is the completed address-loop rotation, and the textbook complex phase is recovered by the projection \(J↦ i\). Gravitational AB is treated as A2 endurance/proper-time holonomy: the matter-wave phase reads the A2 endurance clock difference between two paths in the infrared metric shadow. The central QTT phase ledger is \[ WγQTT = exp\{ J[ q/ c∫_γ A_μ\,dx^μ - mc^2/∫_γ dτA2 ] \}. \] For two interferometer arms, the relative phase is \[ ΔΘQTT = J[ q/ c∮γ_1-γ_2 A_μ\,dx^μ - mc^2/ ( ∫γ_1dτA2 - ∫γ_2dτA2 ) ]. \] The paper recovers the standard low-energy magnetic AB phase and gravitational matter-wave phase. It does not claim ordinary AB experiments uniquely prove QTT; they are consistency tests. The QTT-specific content is the source ontology, the finite address chain-complex formulation of flat but nontrivial holonomy, the source/access no-smuggling firewall, and the A6 high-density finite-capacity frontier. Main status labels: Sigma-AB-A4-DIAL-HOLONOMY-SOURCE-CLOSED Sigma-AB-TEXTBOOK-PHASE-RECOVERED Sigma-GRAV-AB-A2-PROPER-TIME-READOUT-CLOSED-AS-IR-SHADOW Sigma-GRAV-AB-OVERSTREET-CONSISTENCY-GREEN-NOT-DISCRIMINATING Sigma-AB-A6-HIGH-DENSITY-DEVIATION-FRONTIER The gravitational section explicitly references the QTT A2 Endurance-to-Einstein-field paper, because gravitational AB is read here as a proper-time/endurance holonomy in the infrared metric shadow, not as evidence for a graviton source ontology. Related QTT anchors: Main book: Quantum Traction Theory: Main Book v10.01 A2 Endurance to Einstein-Field Dynamics: 10.5281/zenodo.20763263 Hamiltonian Framework: 10.5281/zenodo.20484907 Aharonov and Bohm (1959): 10.1103/PhysRev.115.485 Overstreet et al. (2022): 10.1126/science.abl7152 Included files: PDF paper, Version 1.0 LaTeX source Render audit Zenodo metadata draft SHA256 sums
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Attar Ali (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: