Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This work reconstructs foundations of mathematics using the Infinium, bridging category and set theory, with formal verification in Lean 4.
This work carries out a genetic reconstruction of mathematics from a single pre-mathematical act — the act of distinction. Following the principle of minimal complexity (economy), we show that this act necessarily gives rise to the right isosceles triangle △₁ₓ₁ (the infinium) with legs 1 and hypotenuse √2. This object, in turn, generates numbers, logic, geometry, analysis, and topology. In categorical language, the infinium is simultaneously an object in ZFC (a set of points) and a morphism in category theory (the hypotenuse as a universal relation). This duality makes it a universal bridge between the set-theoretic and category-theoretic approaches to the foundations of mathematics. A complete ZFC-model of △-ontology is constructed without any sorry. The theorem of the infinium's terminality is proved: any △-object reduces to ℑ through a finite sequence of Φ and Ψ operations, generalizing the origami proof of the Collatz conjecture. The equivalence of the ZFC-model and the categorical model is proved. All 17 theorems are formally verified in Lean 4. The central formula of the work: Math = Eco(Dist) ⊗ △₁ₓ₁.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alexey (KAMAZ) Petrov (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: