Key result
Nebulized verapamil did not significantly differ from placebo in SpO2 change (p=0.883) but reduced systolic blood pressure (-16 mmHg with 10 mg; p<0.001) and RVSP.
Why the study?
PH secondary to chronic lung diseases poses a major therapeutic challenge because systemic vasodilators can worsen ventilation-perfusion mismatch and hypoxemia, whereas inhaled therapy offers potential selective pulmonary vasodilation with minimal systemic effects.
Does nebulized verapamil improve oxygenation and right ventricular systolic pressure in patients with pulmonary hypertension secondary to chronic lung diseases?
RCT (n=45)
Double-blind
Randomized
Does nebulized verapamil improve oxygenation and right ventricular systolic pressure in patients with pulmonary hypertension secondary to chronic lung diseases?
p-value: p=0.883
Nebulized verapamil (particularly the 10 mg dose) provides short-term improvements in pulmonary hemodynamics and lung function without impairing oxygenation in patients with group 3 pulmonary hypertension.
Background: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) secondary to chronic lung diseases (CLD) remains a major therapeutic challenge, as systemic vasodilators may aggravate ventilation–perfusion mismatch and worsen hypoxemia. Inhaled therapy offers the potential for selective pulmonary vasodilation with minimal systemic effects.Aim: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of nebulized verapamil on respiratory, hemodynamic, and functional parameters in patients with group 3 PH due to CLD.Patients and Methods: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial was conducted on 45 patients with PH secondary to CLD, divided equally into three groups: control (placebo), verapamil 10 mg, and verapamil 20 mg. Nebulized verapamil or placebo was administered twice daily for three days. The primary outcome was the change in oxygenation (SpO₂) and RVSP following treatment.Results: All study groups demonstrated significant improvements over time in SpO₂ (time effect p < 0.001), with no significant difference between the verapamil and placebo groups (time × treatment interaction p = 0.883). Verapamil treatment was associated with significant reductions in systolic blood pressure (−16 mmHg with 10 mg and −10 mmHg with 20 mg; interaction p < 0.001) and improvements in pulmonary function parameters (FVC and FEV₁), which were not observed in the control group. Right ventricular systolic pressure decreased significantly in both verapamil groups. Bradycardia occurred only in the 20 mg group (20%).Conclusion: Nebulized verapamil produced short-term improvements in pulmonary hemodynamics and lung function without impairing oxygenation; the 10 mg dose showed the most favorable efficacy–safety profile, supporting its use as an acute adjunct therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ibraheem et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Pulmonary hypertension secondary to chronic lung diseases (n=45). Nebulized verapamil vs. Placebo was evaluated on Change in oxygenation (SpO₂) and RVSP following treatment (p=0.883). Nebulized verapamil did not significantly differ from placebo in SpO2 change (p=0.883) but reduced systolic blood pressure (-16 mmHg with 10 mg; p<0.001) and RVSP.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: