Transvenous defibrillation lead systems reduce perioperative mortality, hospitalization, and costs compared with epicardial leads, achieving efficacy in about 90% of patients with dual coil systems.
Do transvenous defibrillation lead systems improve outcomes and efficacy compared to traditional epicardial lead systems in patients requiring ICDs?
Transvenous defibrillation lead systems, particularly active pectoral pulse generators with biphasic waveforms, offer reduced perioperative mortality and high efficacy compared to epicardial systems.
The use of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator has grown dramatically over the past 10 years. One of the major advances in defibrillation technology is the development of transvenous lead systems. Compared with traditional epicardial lead systems, transvenous defibrillation leads reduce perioperative mortality, hospitalization, and costs. Transvenous lead systems provide reliable sensing of ventricular tachyarrhythmias, although redetection of ventricular fibrillation can be prolonged, especially with integrated lead systems. Both ramp and burst adaptive pacing are equally effective for the termination of ventricular tachycardia and are successful in up to 90% of spontaneous events. Defibrillation thresholds are higher with transvenous leads than with epicardial patches. These thresholds are reduced with the use of multiple transvenous leads, subcutaneous patches, or with reversing shock polarity. However, the development of biphasic waveforms has made the largest impact on the efficacy of these lead systems, allowing dual coil transvenous systems to be effective in about 90% of patients. Defibrillation efficacy is further enhanced and implantation simplified by the incorporation of an active pulse generator located in the left pectoral region. Active pectoral pulse generators with biphasic waveforms will be the primary lead system for new implants.
Gold et al. (Sat,) conducted a review in Ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Transvenous defibrillation lead systems vs. Epicardial lead systems was evaluated. Transvenous defibrillation lead systems reduce perioperative mortality, hospitalization, and costs compared with epicardial leads, achieving efficacy in about 90% of patients with dual coil systems.