Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Assesses cleat-turf interaction mechanics in robotic tests, suggesting implications for player safety.
The goal of this study was to develop a test methodology for use in studying cleat-turf mechanical interaction that permits laboratory testing, precision-controlled inputs, variation in normal load applied to the cleat, and imaging of the cleat-turf interaction. This new test method utilized a 6 DOF force/torque and position-controlled serial robotic test device to perform compress-then-shear tests between a cleated shoe surrogate and artificial turf samples. The test method proved to be repeatable in displacement-controlled inputs across variations in axial load. Force response data were also repeatable, but variations in shear response were indicative of inherent variability in turf construction. Precise identification of cleat-turf release was permitted through high-speed imaging and verified to occur at the time of peak horizontal force. A linear relationship was found between release shear force and normal force at time of release for both posterior and lateral shear test types under the loading regime investigated (R 2 = 0.96, R 2 = 0.97). This linear regression represents a “release traction” that can be used to help better understand how turf construction relates to cleat-turf interaction mechanics, which is necessary to optimize player safety and performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Koerber et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: