Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Audit notes reveal the derivation of neutrino masses using the Koide formula, suggesting major implications for particle physics.
Audit note. This paper predates the framework's methodology audit of 2026-05-30. Three recharacterisations apply: (i) DRIFT M9: the lepton Koide phase δ_ = 2/9 and the neutrino phase δ_ν = 3/9 as exact rationals are recharacterised as transcendentals ≈ 2/9 and ≈ 3/9 respectively, by Lindemann--Weierstrass on algebraic substrate amplitudes; the empirical lepton δ = 0.222230 ± 8 × 10⁻⁶ sits 0.89σ from rational 2/9. (ii) §15 item 86 + correction: the ``universal 2/9 + 1/9 = 3/9'' framing reads as defect-index density d/N on the LQ = 0 codespace, with R_ = √ 2 from two Dirac paths retained at near-Locked tier (Koide amplitude Q = 2/3 holds to 10⁻⁵) but the precise phase identifications retained at Proposition tier. (iii) §16.3 search-space accounting: precision-match claims (such as ``1.6% agreement with oscillation data'') require formula-free We extend the circlette lattice mass formula to the neutrino sector. The CNOT gate's inactivity for neutrinos (LQ=0, I3=0) predicts R_nu=1 and delta_nu=1/3=3/9. The mass-squared ratio matches NuFIT 5.3 to 1.6%. Predicted masses: m1~0.8 meV, m2~8.7 meV, m3~50.1 meV, with mass sum ~60 meV (normal ordering). The neutrino Koide ratio is Q_nu=1/2 exactly. v2.0 (2026-06-12): an in-PDF dated status/erratum note has been added reflecting the June 2026 canon audit (DRIFT/ANCHOR ledger); see the paper's status note for the specific corrections, supersessions, or upgrades. 2026-06-20 legacy canon revision: This is a canon-reconciled legacy version. Neutrino/sterile/Majorana status changed The paper retains its historical derivation trail but carries a 2026-06-20 canon revision note identifying current status and superseded claims. 2026-06-21 canon refresh: This version incorporates the 2026-06-21 ANCHOR/DRIFT/PTMS canon refresh and rebuilt local PDF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
D. G. Elliman (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: