Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates HFFN integration into Transformer inference, indicating performance benefits.
Feed-forward networks (FFNs) dominate a large share of Transformer parameters and inference work. Hidden-FFN (HFFN) was previously introduced as an exact sparse FFN method based on hidden-neuron decompositionand validated on isolated FFN blocks. This paper studies the next question: does HFFN remain useful insidecomplete toy Transformer forward inference?I introduce an evaluation runtime that replaces Transformer FFN sublayers with HFFN while keeping attention,embeddings, normalization, residuals, and the language-model head in the surrounding PyTorch graph. Thereported benchmark path replaces FFN sublayers only; the tighter fused post-attention entry point and full-graphLLM runtime support are left for future work. The system is evaluated end-to-end on a controlled family of 17toy Transformer models covering 3 dense models, 14 sparse models, and 56 sparse model/sequence configurationsover sequence lengths 1, 8, 16, and 32 on an Apple M1 CPU setup.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maxime Parker (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: