Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective review evaluates device management and clinical outcomes in refractory spasticity treatments suggesting important considerations.
Objective Intrathecal baclofen (ITB) therapy is an established treatment for refractory spasticity; however, long-term real-world data integrating both clinical outcomes and device-related factors remain limited. This study aimed to evaluate long-term outcomes and device-related management issues associated with intrathecal drug delivery systems, with a primary focus on intrathecal baclofen therapy for refractory spasticity. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 137 patients who underwent intrathecal pump implantation between 2008 and 2024 at a single tertiary center. Patients were categorized into six diagnostic groups. Clinical outcomes, drug dosing patterns, complications, and device-related parameters including refill frequency and pump longevity were analyzed. Results A total of 103 patients received ITB therapy and 34 received intrathecal morphine. During follow-up, 104 patients (75.9%) continued therapy with regular refills, and 29 patients required pump replacement. In the ITB group, 94.2% of patients showed improvement in Modified Ashworth Scale scores. Device-related complications occurred in 16 cases (9.47%), most of which required surgical revision. Deaths observed during follow-up were attributed to underlying disease progression and were not directly related to the device or therapy. Conclusion A total of 103 patients received ITB therapy and 34 received intrathecal morphine. During follow-up, 104 patients (75.9%) continued therapy with regular refills, and 29 patients required pump replacement. In the ITB group, 94.2% of patients showed improvement in Modified Ashworth Scale scores. Device-related complications occurred in 16 cases (9.47%), most of which required surgical revision. Deaths observed during follow-up were attributed to underlying disease progression and were not directly related to the device or therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rim et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: