Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates chiral symmetry breaking effects on pion mass in theoretical frameworks, suggesting new insights into particle physics.
Audit note. This paper predates the framework's methodology audit of 2026-05-30. The headline ``no free parameters at any stage'' framing is read in the post-audit sense at §16.3 search-space classification: the structural mechanism (f_π as bridge-to-bulk interface condition; GMOR from 2-step walk; chiral-log screening from 2D Pólya recurrence) survives at Proposition tier; the precise numerical matches (f_π at 0.7%, m_π at 1%) are class-2 tight matches whose formula-freedom (the √4π normalisation choice, the specific 1-loop screening form) has not yet undergone item-by-item audit. The pion-mass framework remains one of the cleaner Target-B candidates in canon, with several anchored open items (ANCHOR §15 items 69--71 on discrete-vs-continuum Green's function, item 72 HQET kaon framework) marking the substrate-level derivation steps that still need rigorising. We derive f_pi=Lambda_QCD/sqrt(4*pi)~93.66 MeV (0.7% from experiment). The GMOR relation follows from a 2-step quantum walk, yielding a bare mass of 169 MeV. The 1-loop self-energy via the 2D lattice Green's function screens the mass to m_pi=136.1 MeV (1% of the neutral pion). Zero free parameters at any stage. 2026-06-20 legacy erratum: This version adds a canon erratum note to the legacy paper. Pion derivation mostly held; update status The body is preserved as a historical derivation trail; the erratum note identifies the current ANCHOR/DRIFT status and superseded claims. 2026-06-21 canon refresh: This version incorporates the 2026-06-21 ANCHOR/DRIFT/PTMS canon refresh and rebuilt local PDF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
D. G. Elliman (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: