Quantifies lifespan loss from tumors and neurodegenerative diseases, suggesting a unified evaluation system.
Integrating the lifespan formula L = Tavg × N and the full spectrum of cellular lesions recorded in SFL-CELL-02 to SFL-CELL-05, this paper establishes a universal quantitative standard to calculate lifespan loss brought by tumors, ALS, Parkinson’s disease and Alzheimer’s disease. All these illnesses share identical core logic: irreversible ΔGd(-) destruction of specific cell G₀ functional modules triggers mass premature cell rupture, suppresses systemic Tavg and speeds up the exhaustion of fixed renewal quota N. Malignant tumors arise from broken proliferation-limiting G₀ modules, creating endless abnormal cell division; ALS originates from collapsing axon repair modules of motor neurons; Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s disease stem from impaired protein clearance modules in neural cells. Each pathological state generates persistent systemic micro-injury and abnormal cell turnover, dragging down the whole-body average functional cycle. Using the unified baseline N=10 for comparison: healthy humans hold Tavg=8 with baseline lifespan 80 years. Patients with moderate neurodegeneration or early cancer show Tavg dropping to 5 years (theoretical lifespan 50 years); severe late-stage cases may push Tavg as low as 3 years, only 30 years of predicted lifespan left. Traditional clinical treatments only eliminate superficial lesions (tumors, protein plaques, nerve inflammatory response) without restoring damaged native G₀ architecture, so they cannot reverse the low Tavg state and stop fast consumption of renewal quota. Fundamental intervention aims to reduce cumulative ΔGd(-), repair cell G₀ integrity, raise Tavg and slow quota depletion. This paper unifies all major chronic disorders into one quantitative aging evaluation system, perfectly matching the “repair decline spectrum” concept from SFL-CELL-06, realizing the organic combination of qualitative cellular pathology and quantitative lifespan calculation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
FOO SENG ANG (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: