Fundamental Failures of the Modern Scientific Worldview The modern scientific paradigm is trapped in a state of semantic entropy. We contend that the scientific community commits three fundamental errors that stifle the advancement of knowledge: Ontological Abdication: Science deliberately excludes Consciousness () from its list of foundational categories, reducing it to a mere byproduct of neurophysiological processes. This renders the formalization of the Observer impossible, without which any model of reality remains fundamentally incomplete. Methodological Blindness to Interaction: The lack of a formalized operator for the interaction between Consciousness and Reality (the Continuum) reduces the process of cognition to a "black box. " Science records the results of observations while fundamentally ignoring the act of their genesis, defined within our framework as. Absence of an Axiomatic Basis: Fundamental concepts—Matter, Information, Consciousness, Action—lack rigorous mathematical definitions. Instead of an "Algebra of Being, " modern science operates on a collection of vague definitions, leading to the accumulation of logical contradictions. APh Doctrine: The Transition to Predicative Algebra Resolving the core questions of ontology and epistemology has allowed us to establish and formally describe the Ontological Basis. This facilitates a definitive transition from descriptive philosophy—which generates semantic chaos—to rigorous predicative algebra. Resolution of the "Hard Problem": Act of Consciousness is no longer an inexplicable phenomenon; it is defined as the sole Absolute Truth (ABS), the singular operator dictating the structure of the entire observable Continuum. Mathematical Completeness: The formal procedure of discrete interpretation at each iterative cycle transforms the unknowable Continuum into a structured system of data Separatum, rendered accessible for absolute verification.
Oleg Kurbanov (Sun,) studied this question.