Key result
This monograph provides a thorough review of hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy and its major manifestations, but contains little information on its natural history or therapy.
This text is a review of a monograph on hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy by Dr. Meerschwam.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Highlights gaps in natural history and therapy data; leaves open need for longitudinal studies in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy.
Dr. Meerschwam has prepared a monograph on a very interesting condition known, in the United States, mostly, as idiopathic hypertrophic subaortic stenosis. He has painstakingly followed a series of his own patients, reviewed the world literature on the subject, and prepared a most thorough bibliography. He has been very critical of the information he has reviewed and has not fallen into the trap of lumping a number of myocardiopathies under the same heading. Certainly, at this stage of confusion regarding the etiology of the cardiomyopathies, an author must be exceedingly careful not to confuse the picture further with muddy classification. The book is very easy to read, the illustrations are excellent, and all of the presently appreciated major manifestations of this disease are included and given adequate coverage. There is relatively little in the book relating to the natural history of the disease or methods and results of therapy. The
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
John O. Burris (1970) conducted a review in Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy. This monograph provides a thorough review of hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy and its major manifestations, but contains little information on its natural history or therapy.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: