Key result
Utilizing both brain natriuretic peptide and hydration status measurements to guide therapy in acutely decompensated heart failure may help achieve euvolemia and optimize treatment.
Why the study?
Does using Brain Natriuretic Peptide and bioimpedance to guide therapy improve outcomes in patients with acutely decompensated heart failure?
Does using Brain Natriuretic Peptide and bioimpedance to guide therapy improve outcomes in patients with acutely decompensated heart failure?
Combining BNP levels and hydration status measurements may help monitor heart failure patients and actively guide optimal therapy titration.
May support BNP and bioimpedance guidance in ADHF; leaves open need for randomized outcome trials.
The key management goals for the stabilization of patients admitted for acutely decompensated heart failure (ADHF) include relief of congestion and restoration of hemodynamic stability. Nevertheless, in spite of clinical improvement, many patients are discharged with hemodynamic congestion. In response to volume expansion, the heart secretes the brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) with a biological action that counter-regulates the activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. Since BNP is released by increased volume load and wall stretch, and declines after treatment with drugs of proven efficacy, on the basis of an improvement in filling pressures the level of BNP has been proposed as a 'measure' of congestion. The BNP level of a patient who is admitted with ADHF comprises two components: a baseline, euvolemic 'dry' BNP level and a level induced by volume or pressure overload ('wet' BNP level). So, the prognostic value of BNP during hospitalization depends on the time of measurement: from the lowest on admission when congestion is present (wet BNP) to the highest on clinical and instrumental stability (dry BNP), following the achievement of normohydration, as determined by fluid volume measurement. Euvolemia can be set as the primary goal of treatment for ADHF with dry BNP concentration as a target for discharge other than improvement of symptoms, because high BNP levels predict rehospitalization and death. Discharge criteria utilizing both BNP and hydration status measurement which account for the heterogeneity of the patient population and incorporate different strategies of care should be developed. This could in the next future offer an aid in monitoring heart failure patients or actively guiding optimal titration of therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Valle et al. (2010) conducted a review in Acutely decompensated heart failure (ADHF). BNP and bioimpedance-guided therapy was evaluated. Utilizing both brain natriuretic peptide and hydration status measurements to guide therapy in acutely decompensated heart failure may help achieve euvolemia and optimize treatment.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: