Key result
Systemic alteplase linked to ~30% shorter ICU stays vs UFH in PE, with similar bleeding.
Why the study?
Does systemic alteplase improve safety outcomes and reduce length of stay compared to unfractionated heparin in ICU-managed intermediate-high risk pulmonary embolism?
Cohort (n=80)
No
Does systemic alteplase improve safety outcomes and reduce length of stay compared to unfractionated heparin in ICU-managed intermediate-high risk pulmonary embolism?
In ICU-managed intermediate-high risk PE, systemic alteplase was associated with shorter ICU and hospital length of stay without an increased risk of major bleeding compared to unfractionated heparin.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support alteplase in selected ICU-managed intermediate-high risk PE; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation before practice change.
Full-dose systemic thrombolysis reduces haemodynamic decompensation in intermediate-high risk pulmonary embolism (PE) but increases bleeding risk, and its real-world safety profile in ICU settings remains incompletely characterised. We describe treatment selection patterns, safety outcomes, and resource utilisation associated with systemic alteplase versus unfractionated heparin (UFH) in ICU-managed intermediate-high risk PE. Prospective single-centre cohort; 80 adults with CTPA-confirmed intermediate-high risk PE (2020-2024), 40 per arm. Outcomes included mortality, bleeding, clinical deterioration, and ICU and hospital length of stay (LOS). Firth penalised logistic regression was used for binary outcomes with complete separation; negative binomial regression with covariate adjustment (age, APACHE II, Charlson Comorbidity Index, PESI class) for LOS. Clinicians preferentially selected alteplase for younger patients with greater PE-specific severity markers, and UFH for older, more comorbid patients with higher physiological derangement. Major bleeding was rare in both groups (UFH 2/40; alteplase 1/40; P = 0.781), with no intracranial or fatal events. Clinical deterioration occurred exclusively in the UFH group (17.5% vs 0%; P = 0.012), though most events represented rescue thrombolysis, structurally unobservable in the alteplase arm; no residual signal persisted after its exclusion (adjusted OR 0.77; P = 0.89). ICU LOS (rate ratio 0.70; P = 0.007) and hospital LOS (rate ratio 0.73; P = 0.019) were shorter with alteplase after covariate adjustment. In this prospective ICU cohort of carefully selected intermediate-high risk PE patients, systemic alteplase was associated with a favourable safety profile and shorter hospitalisation. These hypothesis-generating findings support prospective studies targeting ICU-managed intermediate-high risk PE.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marić et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Intermediate-high risk pulmonary embolism (n=80). Systemic alteplase vs. Unfractionated heparin (UFH) was evaluated on Major bleeding (p=0.781). Systemic alteplase was associated with shorter ICU length of stay (rate ratio 0.70; P=0.007) and similar major bleeding (2.5% vs 5.0%; P=0.781) compared to unfractionated heparin in PE.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: