Key result
Immune-stromal cell crosstalk governs the initiation and resolution of inflammation and fibrosis after MI.
Understanding the immune-stromal cell bidirectional network provides new perspectives and theoretical foundations for preventing and treating heart failure following myocardial infarction.
Maps post-MI immune-stromal crosstalk; leaves open targeted interventions for heart failure pending validation.
Heart failure following myocardial infarction (MI) is a major complication affecting long-term prognosis of patient, with its core pathological processes being ventricular pathological remodeling and fibrosis. This process is not merely simple scar formation, but is dominated by a continuous, dynamic, and intricate bidirectional dialogue between immune cells and cardiac stromal cells. This review systematically mapped the complex interactive networks between immune cells—including neutrophils, macrophages, and lymphocytes—and stromal cells such as cardiac fibroblasts, endothelial cells, and pericytes during the spatiotemporal evolution following MI. We emphasizes the key communication pathways involving cytokines, chemokines, fibrotic signals, and active signals from the microenvironment. And we mappied their spatiotemporal network governing the initiation and resolution of inflammation and fibrosis. Simultaneously, we explored how this network’s imbalance shifts from essential repair responses to pathological fibrosis, ultimately leading to heart failure. Furthermore, we summarized novel therapeutic strategies targeting the immune-matrix axis, aiming to provide new perspectives and theoretical foundations for the precise prevention and treatment of heart failure following MI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) conducted a review in Myocardial infarction and heart failure. The bidirectional regulatory network between immune cells and cardiac stromal cells governs the initiation and resolution of inflammation and fibrosis following myocardial infarction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: