Key result
High-intensity short-interval training reduces visceral fat ~31% and lowers triglycerides vs moderate-intensity protocols.
Why the study?
Does interval training with different intensities and interval structures improve cardiometabolic health indicators in sedentary young males?
RCT (n=40)
Assessor-blinded
Computer-generated random number sequence
No
Does interval training with different intensities and interval structures improve cardiometabolic health indicators in sedentary young males?
Absolute Event Rate: 24.23% vs 35.15%
p-value: p=0.030
In sedentary young males, 8 weeks of high-intensity interval training improves visceral adiposity and lipid profiles more effectively than moderate-intensity interval training.
Favors high-intensity over moderate-intensity interval training for visceral fat and lipid improvements in sedentary young males; extends RCT evidence on intensity effects.
Objective Sedentary behavior is closely associated with early cardiometabolic dysfunction in young populations. However, under approximately matched prescribed active-work-load conditions, it remains unclear whether interval-training protocols differing in exercise intensity and interval structure induce different cardiometabolic responses in sedentary individuals. Methods Forty sedentary young males (22.85 ± 0.22 years) were randomized to four 8-week interval-training protocols: moderate-intensity short-interval group (MISI: 60%–70% maximal heart rate (HRmax), 60 s work/30 s rest), moderate-intensity long-interval group (MILI: 60%–70% HRmax, 60 s work/120 s rest), high-intensity short-interval group (HISI: 85%–95% HRmax, 30 s work/30 s rest), and high-intensity long-interval group (HILI: 85%–95% HRmax, 30 s work/120 s rest) (n = 10 per group). Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA was used to compare pre–post changes in body fat percentage (BFP), skeletal muscle mass (SMM), visceral fat area (VFA), basal metabolic rate (BMR), total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C). Results BFP, VFA, TC, and TG decreased significantly in all four protocols, whereas SMM and HDL-C increased significantly. BMR increased significantly in MILI, HISI, and HILI, but not in MISI. VFA decreased in all groups, and post-intervention VFA was significantly lower in HISI than in MILI ( p < 0.05). TG decreased in all groups, and post-intervention TG was significantly lower in HISI than in MISI ( p < 0.05). Improvements in LDL-C were observed only in the high-intensity training groups ( p < 0.05). HDL-C increased significantly in all four protocols, and post-intervention HDL-C was significantly higher in HISI and HILI than in MILI. Conclusion Eight weeks of interval training was associated with favorable changes in selected body composition and lipid-profile indicators in sedentary young males. Compared with the moderate-intensity protocols, the high-intensity protocols showed more favorable changes in selected outcomes, including VFA, TG, and LDL-C. The HISI protocol may represent a promising option for improving selected cardiometabolic risk indicators related to visceral adiposity and lipid metabolism in sedentary young males; however, these findings should be interpreted cautiously given the small sample size, the absence of a non-exercise control group, and the lack of direct physiological-load measurements.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shen et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Sedentary behavior (n=40). High-intensity short-interval training (HISI) vs. Moderate-intensity long-interval training (MILI) was evaluated on Visceral fat area (VFA) at 8 weeks (cm²) (p=0.030). Eight weeks of high-intensity short-interval training significantly reduced visceral fat area and triglycerides compared to moderate-intensity protocols in sedentary young males.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: