Key result
FEVAR and BEVAR achieve ~96% technical success with low MAE in post-dissection thoracoabdominal aneurysms.
Why the study?
Does fenestrated and branched endovascular repair (FEVAR and BEVAR) provide safe and effective outcomes in patients with post-dissection thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms?
Meta-Analysis (n=912)
Does fenestrated and branched endovascular repair (FEVAR and BEVAR) provide safe and effective outcomes in patients with post-dissection thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms?
Complex endovascular repair (FEVAR and BEVAR) is a viable strategy for post-dissection thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms with high technical success, though target vessel durability remains a limitation.
Supports complex endovascular repair as a viable alternative to open surgery for post-dissection aneur.
No abstract yet. The journal hasn't published one we can show.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Luca et al. (2026) conducted a meta-analysis in post-dissection thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysms (PD-TAAA) (n=912). Fenestrated and branched endovascular repair (FEVAR and BEVAR) was evaluated on Target vessel (TV) instability. Fenestrated and branched endovascular repair for post-dissection thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms achieved a 96.0% technical success rate and a pooled MAE and early mortality rate of 4.6%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: