Key result
Double sinus rhythm conduction phenotype burden linked to ~24-fold higher 24-month AF recurrence.
Why the study?
Does sinus rhythm conduction phenotyping using vector flow mapping associate with atrial remodeling, recurrence, and thromboembolic risk in patients undergoing first-time AF ablation?
Cohort (n=80)
Does sinus rhythm conduction phenotyping using vector flow mapping associate with atrial remodeling, recurrence, and thromboembolic risk in patients undergoing first-time AF ablation?
Sinus rhythm vector flow mapping identifies distinct conduction phenotypes that correlate with progressive atrial structural remodeling and may help predict AF recurrence and thromboembolic risk.
May support conduction phenotyping for post-ablation recurrence risk; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Background Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) achieves success in 60–80% of first ablation procedures. Sinus rhythm vector flow mapping (COHERENT module) may enable phenotype-guided ablation. Objective To classify sinus rhythm conduction phenotypes using COHERENT mapping and assess associations with atrial remodeling, recurrence, and thromboembolic risk. Methods We prospectively enrolled 80 consecutive patients (mean age 65.1 ± 12.5 years; 32.5% persistent AF) undergoing initial AF ablation with high-density sinus rhythm mapping. Five phenotypes were defined: Normal flow, Conduction delay (CD), Congested flow (CF), Disrupted flow (DF), and Bachmann's bundle split (BBS). Patients were grouped into eight mutually exclusive (MECE) phenotype-burden categories (Normal, four single-phenotype groups, Double, Triple, Quadruple). Outcomes were assessed by unadjusted logistic regression with Normal as the reference; all 80 patients completed 24-month follow-up. Results Phenotype-burden categories showed gradients in structural and AF-related markers. Each 10 mL/m 2 LAVI increase was associated with higher odds of Double (OR 2.16), Triple (3.02), and Quadruple (3.46). Twenty-four-month recurrence: 12/80 (15%); Double showed the only nominally significant association (5/15, 33%; OR 24.62, 95% CI 1.16–521.53). BBS only and Quadruple showed borderline odds for prior stroke/TIA (each 2/7, 28.6%; OR 21.36). Conclusion Sinus rhythm COHERENT mapping delineated distinct conduction phenotypes associated with progressive atrial structural remodeling. Phenotype burden defined a graded atrial cardiomyopathy continuum, with Double showing the highest 24-month recurrence. BBS only and Quadruple shared borderline thromboembolic signals via distinct mechanisms. These findings provide mechanistic insight into atrial cardiomyopathy and generate hypotheses for substrate-guided ablation and thromboembolic-risk assessment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kitamura et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Atrial Fibrillation (n=80). Sinus rhythm conduction phenotyping (COHERENT mapping) vs. Normal phenotype was evaluated on 24-month recurrence (OR 24.62, 95% CI 1.16-521.53). Sinus rhythm conduction phenotyping revealed that a Double phenotype burden was associated with higher 24-month AF recurrence (33%; OR 24.62; 95% CI 1.16-521.53).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: