Key result
Epicardial fat volume is linked to ~4% greater HS-CAD risk per cm3, adding diagnostic value over CACS.
Why the study?
Does epicardial fat volume assessment improve the identification of hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease compared to clinical risk factors and coronary artery calcium score in patients undergoing CCTA and SPECT-MPI?
Cohort (n=140)
Single-blind
No
Does epicardial fat volume assessment improve the identification of hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease compared to clinical risk factors and coronary artery calcium score in patients undergoing CCTA and SPECT-MPI?
Effect estimate: OR 1.04 (95% CI 1.02-1.07)
p-value: p=<0.001
Epicardial fat volume provides incremental diagnostic value over clinical risk factors and coronary artery calcium score for identifying hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease.
Suggests epicardial fat volume may incrementally improve noninvasive detection of hemod.
Background: With the widespread application of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA), exploring novel biomarkers in imaging data to optimize the risk stratification of hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease (HS-CAD) has become a research hotspot. HS-CAD was defined as ≥ 50% stenosis on CCTA with a corresponding reversible perfusion defect on single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT-MPI). Although coronary artery calcium score (CACS) is routinely used, it is difficult to fully reflect the biological activity and functional impact of plaques. This single-center retrospective study aimed to investigate the association between epicardial fat volume (EFV) and HS-CAD, and to evaluate its incremental diagnostic value over clinical risk factors and the CACS. Methods: A single-center retrospective study included 140 patients who underwent both CCTA and SPECT-MPI. EFV and CACS were quantitatively assessed. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent predictors. Results: Among the included patients, 50 (35.7%) had HS-CAD. The HS-CAD group had a higher prevalence of smoking and significantly greater EFV and CACS (all P< 0.05). Multivariable analysis identified smoking history (OR=5.79;95% CI:2.14– 15.66; indicating that smokers had nearly 6-fold higher odds of HS-CAD), CACS (OR=1.91 per 100-unit increase;95% CI:1.35– 2.70), and EFV (OR=1.04 per cm 3 increase;95% CI:1.02– 1.07) as independent predictors (all P< 0.01). The optimal EFV cutoff for predicting HS-CAD was 91.98 cm 3 , with a sensitivity of 0.53 (95% CI: 0.42– 0.63) and specificity of 0.96 (95% CI: 0.91– 1.00). The area under the curve (AUC) for identifying HS-CAD was 0.78 for EFV alone and 0.79 for CACS alone. The combination of smoking history and CACS yielded an AUC of 0.84, which significantly improved to 0.90 after adding EFV. The combined model also showed good calibration and provided a net clinical benefit. Conclusion: EFV is independently associated with HS-CAD and provides incremental diagnostic value over clinical risk factors and CACS in this single-center retrospective study. These findings suggest that EFV may serve as a valuable biomarker for improving non-invasive risk stratification, warranting prospective validation in multicenter studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lu et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Suspected coronary artery disease (n=140). Epicardial fat volume (EFV) vs. Clinical risk factors and coronary artery calcium score (CACS) was evaluated on Hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease (HS-CAD) (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.02-1.07, p=<0.001). Epicardial fat volume is independently associated with hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease (OR 1.04 per cm3 increase) and provides incremental diagnostic value over CACS.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: