Key result
Logistic regression model predicts peri-procedural no-reflow risk in ACS patients undergoing PCI with ~0.88 AUC.
Cohort (n=989)
No
A machine learning-based logistic regression model incorporating six clinical and procedural variables can accurately predict the risk of peri-procedural no-reflow in ACS patients undergoing PCI.
Coronary no-reflow (NR) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) predicts adverse prognosis in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). This study aimed to establish a machine learning-based risk prediction model for peri-procedural NR in ACS patients undergoing PCI. We conducted a single-center, prospective, observational cohort study enrolling consecutive ACS patients undergoing PCI between January 2023 and March 2024. Patients were allocated to a training set (n=692) and a test set (n=297) based on admission order. Key predictive features were screened using Lasso regression and the Boruta algorithm, and the overlapping variables were utilized to construct 5 models: logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM). Model performance was validated in the test set. Among 989 included patients, 145 (14.7%) developed NR. The final predictors included cardiac troponin (cTn), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), pre-PCI TIMI flow grade, number of stents implanted, intraoperative hypotension, and ACS subtypes. The LR model showed the optimal discriminative capacity, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.8799 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.8151-0.9447), as well as favorable accuracy (0.8822), F1-score (0.6316), G-mean (0.7983), and precision-recall curve-area under the curve (PR-AUC) (0.6249). Restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis confirmed a nonlinear relationship between AST levels and NR risk (P-nonlinear < 0.001). In conclusion, we established a concise machine learning-based model for post-PCI NR risk stratification; the nomogram and online calculator support efficient peri-procedural risk assessment in ACS patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Acute Coronary Syndrome (n=989). Machine learning-based risk prediction models was evaluated on Peri-procedural no-reflow risk prediction (AUC 0.8799, 95% CI 0.8151-0.9447). A logistic regression machine learning model optimally predicted peri-procedural no-reflow risk in ACS patients undergoing PCI, achieving an AUC of 0.8799 (95% CI 0.8151-0.9447).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: