Key result
A team-based care model for cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome significantly improved risk factors and increased guideline-directed medical therapy utilization (e.g., 31.0% to 59.6%; P<0.001).
Why the study?
Does a team-based multisite care model improve cardiometabolic risk factors and GDMT adherence in patients with cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome?
Cohort (n=2,223)
Yes
Does a team-based multisite care model improve cardiometabolic risk factors and GDMT adherence in patients with cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome?
A team-based multisite care model significantly improves cardiometabolic risk factors and increases utilization of guideline-directed medical therapy in patients with cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome.
BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are leading causes of morbidity and mortality among patients with cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome. Adoption of guideline-directed medical therapy remains suboptimal. Our objective was to evaluate the impact of a team-based multisite care model on improving quality and reducing disparities in patients with cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome. METHODS: We conducted a prospective clinical cohort study across 9 US sites of the Cardiometabolic Center Alliance, a network of health care organizations with a standardized approach to address CVD risk, between May 2020 and August 2024. Consecutive patients with type 2 diabetes/prediabetes and CVD and chronic kidney disease were enrolled in a clinical program with team care, structured visits, and standardized assessments. Cardiometabolic risk factor levels and proportion of adherence to guideline-directed medical therapy were assessed using longitudinal mixed-effects models accounting for clustering by site. RESULTS: Two thousand two hundred twenty-three individuals were enrolled with a mean (SD) age of 63.9 (11.2) years, 44.2% female, 84.0% White, and 62.5% noncommercially insured; 58.5% had atherosclerotic CVD, 32.6% heart failure, and 29.5% chronic kidney disease. Median follow-up was 6.8 (4.0–9.4) months. Participants had reductions in weight (mean [95% CI], −16.7 [−17.9 to −15.6] lbs), body mass index (−2.6 [−2.8 to −2.4] kg/m 2 ), systolic (−5.8 [−7.0 to −4.6] mm Hg) and diastolic (−1.7 [−2.4 to−0.9] mm Hg) blood pressure, total cholesterol (−26.4 [−29.5 to −23.2] mg/dL), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (−18.8 [−21.4 to −16.2] mg/dL), triglycerides (−45.1 [−54.0 to −36.3] mg/dL), fasting glucose (−30.9 [−35.4 to −26.4] mg/dL), HbA1c (−1.2 [−1.3% to −1.0%]), and insulin dose (−30.4 [−36.1 to −24.8] units/d), P <0.001 for all. Guideline-directed medical therapy increased from 31.0% to 59.6% for atherosclerotic CVD type 2 diabetes and from 33.3% to 63.8% for chronic kidney disease type 2 diabetes, P <0.001. CONCLUSIONS: The Cardiometabolic Center Alliance model is feasible and effective, leading to significant improvement in CVD risk factors and increased utilization of GDMT. Implementation and dissemination of this paradigm remains a priority to close gaps in cardiometabolic care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Neeland et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome (n=2,223). Cardiometabolic Center Alliance team-based care model was evaluated on Cardiometabolic risk factor levels and proportion of adherence to guideline-directed medical therapy (p=<0.001). A team-based care model for cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome significantly improved risk factors and increased guideline-directed medical therapy utilization (e.g., 31.0% to 59.6%; P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: