Key result
Coordinated care for CKM conditions improves satisfaction and cuts health problems and costs vs. usual care.
Why the study?
Coordinated cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic (CKM) care programs needed systematic assessment regarding their types, components, and outcomes.
Do coordinated care programs improve clinical outcomes and reduce costs in patients with ≥2 cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic conditions compared to usual care?
Systematic Review
Yes
Do coordinated care programs improve clinical outcomes and reduce costs in patients with ≥2 cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic conditions compared to usual care?
Coordinated care programs for patients with cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic conditions appear to improve patient satisfaction and reduce healthcare costs compared to usual care.
Supports coordinated care implementation for CKM multimorbidity to boost satisfaction and cut costs; extends evidence to this population and warrants outcome-focused trials.
Objective: To assess coordinated cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic (CKM) care programs, including program types, components, and outcomes. Patients and Methods: We searched Embase and Medline for studies from January 1, 2015 through March 9, 2023, and congress abstracts from January 1, 2021 through March 9, 2023. For inclusion, patients were required to have ≥2 CKM conditions and the coordinated care program assessed the effectiveness of either treatment, monitoring, or risk reduction of all 3 conditions. Two reviewers extracted and assessed the data for accuracy. Randomized controlled trials were assessed for potential bias in the design, conduct, and reporting of clinical trials risk of bias using the Cochrane risk of bias tool, version 2. Observational studies were assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Results: A total of 22 international studies met our inclusion criteria; interventions included patient visits to multidisciplinary team (MDT) care clinics (n=9), pharmacist integration (n=5), patient engagement and education (n=6), or MDT/multispecialty team meetings (n=2). The sample size of studies ranged from 14 to 9601. Overall, results showed greater patient satisfaction and fewer health-related problems with coordinated care programs versus usual care, with increased attendance rates and decreased health care costs for virtual consultations, and further reductions for programs integrating telehealth. Conclusion: Coordinated care for patients with CKM conditions may improve clinical outcomes and reduce healthcare costs. Future research is needed to develop programs with standard reporting, to assess overall effectiveness, and to identify best practices for implementing coordinated care programs. Limitations included heterogeneity in the interventions' design, delivery, CKM population, and outcomes assessed. Trial Registration: PROSPERO Identifier: CRD42023409731.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Duru et al. (2025) conducted a systematic review in Cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic (CKM) conditions. Coordinated care programs vs. Usual care was evaluated on Patient satisfaction, health-related problems, attendance rates, and health care costs. A systematic review of 22 studies found that coordinated care programs for CKM conditions improved patient satisfaction and reduced health-related problems and costs compared to usual care.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: