Key result
G-CSF and SCF enhance LV functional reserve, improving stress EF by ~7% without replacing scar.
Why the study?
Cytokine-induced mobilization of bone marrow stem cells in the heart may represent a promising strategy for replacing infarcted myocardium, but whether G-CSF and SCF promote myocardial regeneration and improve LV function remained to be investigated.
Does granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and stem cell factor improve left ventricular function in Sprague-Dawley rats after permanent coronary occlusion?
Does granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and stem cell factor improve left ventricular function in Sprague-Dawley rats after permanent coronary occlusion?
G-CSF and SCF administration after myocardial infarction in a rat model improves left ventricular functional reserve without evidence of myocardial regeneration or scar replacement.
Hypothesis-generating for G-CSF/SCF to boost post-MI contractile reserve in rats; leaves open translation to human LV function.
OBJECTIVES: We investigated whether granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and stem cell factor (SCF) could promote myocardial regeneration after coronary artery occlusion and improve left ventricular (LV) function. BACKGROUND: Cytokine-induced mobilization of bone marrow stem cells in the heart may represent a promising strategy for replacing infarcted myocardium. METHODS: Sprague-Dawley rats were subjected to permanent coronary occlusion. A treated group (n = 19) received G-CSF (100 microg/kg) and SCF (25 microg/kg) subcutaneously, starting 2 h after surgery and continuing daily for an additional 4 days. Control rats (n = 21) received sterile water. The peripheral blood content in hematopoietic progenitor cells was analyzed. RESULTS: At eight weeks, LV angiograms (rest and dobutamine stress) and histologic analysis were performed. At rest, LV ejection fraction (LVEF) was 0.45 in controls and 0.52 in treated hearts (p = 0.16). For any infarct size, LVEF was greater in the treated group (p = 0.045). Under dobutamine stress, treated animals had smaller LV end-diastolic and -systolic volumes (0.37 +/- 0.04 ml and 0.16 +/- 0.03 ml) versus control animals (0.51 +/- 0.05 ml and 0.26 +/- 0.04 ml; p = 0.026 and 0.048) with a 7% improvement in ejection fraction. Scar thickness was 1.1 +/- 0.1 mm in treated hearts and 1.0 +/- 0.1 mm in controls (p = 0.36). Scar morphology was similar in both groups without obvious new muscle in the scar. CONCLUSIONS: Because we did not find evidence of new muscle cells in the infarct area, our conclusion is that G-CSF and SCF enhanced the LV functional reserve of the heart without replacing scar tissue.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sesti et al. (2005) studied this question. G-CSF and SCF enhanced left ventricular functional reserve under dobutamine stress, improving ejection fraction by 7% and reducing end-systolic volume (p=0.048) without replacing scar tissue.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: