Key result
Publicly releasing risk-adjusted cardiac data is linked to lower mortality and shifted referral patterns.
Why the study?
This communication aims to relate the history of the New York State cardiac registries initiative and review evidence regarding changes that have occurred since the public release of risk-adjusted cardiac data.
Design
Review and critique
Authors
Loading...
Captured external expert commentary on this paper, strongest first. Original sources are linked where available.
“If we're going to use 30-day mortality after PCI as an indicator of operator and programmatic quality, then acute cases anticipated to have a high intrinsic risk have to be excluded because when they're included, the resulting event rate is higher inherently, which reflects only case acuity and not quality of service.”
“This is a great standard that others should follow.”
“Physicians are always trying to do what's best for the patients. I don't think that they're letting the public reporting drive their decision-making.”
Outcome variations prompted cardiac registries; leaves open their current impact on quality metrics.
The New York State Cardiac Registries and the public reporting of risk-adjusted outcomes have significantly impacted cardiac care delivery, leading to decreased mortality and changes in provider behavior.
Hannan et al. (2012) conducted a review in Cardiac surgery and percutaneous coronary interventions. Public release of risk-adjusted cardiac data was evaluated. The public release of risk-adjusted cardiac data in New York State was associated with decreases in risk-adjusted mortality, changes in referral patterns, and modifications in market share.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: