Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates progression-free survival in advanced large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, indicating potential efficacy of combination therapy.
BACKGROUND: LCNEC is a rare high-grade neuroendocrine malignancy with poor prognosis and limited evidence to guide systemic therapy. METHODS: Prospective, single-arm phase II study of 1st-line durvalumab 1500 mg + cisplatin or carboplatin and etoposide (EP) q3 weeks for 4 cycles, followed by durvalumab 1500 mg q4 weeks, in aLCNEC. The primary endpoint was 12-month PFS (RECIST v1.1, radiologist-assessed); secondary endpoints were ORR, OS, and safety. Sample size followed a single-stage Fleming design (one-sided α = 0.10, power 80%) testing a 12-month PFS rate ≤ 5% (H0) vs ≥ 18% (H1). The study closed early due to slow accrual after twelve of twenty-two planned patients were enrolled. RESULTS: Twelve patients were treated (median age 68y; 66.7% male; 91.7% smokers; 91.7% stage IVB). After median follow-up of 12.8 months (95% CI 8.5-21.3), 92% had progressed and 75% had died. Median PFS was 4.4 months (95% CI 3.1-12.9); 12-month PFS was 25.0% (95% CI 6.0-50.5), exceeding the ≤ 5% null hypothesis (H0) and compatible with the ≥ 18% target (H1). Median OS was 12.8 months (95% CI 5.2-NR); 12-month OS was 58.3% (95% CI 27.0-80.1). ORR was 50.0%, and DCR was 91.7%. All three patients with untreated brain metastases achieved complete intracranial response. Toxicities were mainly grade 1-2; 41.7% had grade 3 adverse events; three discontinued durvalumab for immune-related toxicity; and no treatment-related deaths occurred. CONCLUSIONS: This first prospective evaluation of durvalumab + EP in aLCNEC, though underpowered, demonstrates efficacy and safety consistent with design expectations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dudnik et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: