Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Multicenter case-control study evaluates serum neuroglobin for predicting clinical outcomes in children with TBI, highlighting its potential utility.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) represents a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in children. This study aimed to delineate the temporal profile of serum neuroglobin in children after TBI and to evaluate its utility as a potential biomarker for assessing TBI severity and predicting clinical outcomes in pediatric age groups. METHODS: A multicenter case-control study was conducted involving 110 children with TBI (≤18 years) admitted to 5 tertiary-care hospitals in Egypt. The study included 100 healthy children as a control group. Serum neuroglobin concentrations were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay at 3 time points: on admission and at 24 and 72 hours thereafter. The temporal kinetics of serum neuroglobin were analyzed in relation to admission Glasgow Coma Scale scores and clinical outcomes assessed 6 months after trauma using the Glasgow Outcome Scale. RESULTS: Serum neuroglobin levels were significantly higher in children with TBI than in controls at admission (P < .001), reached the highest levels at 24 hours postinjury (P < .001), and then declined by 72 hours. Peak serum neuroglobin showed a significant inverse correlation with Glasgow Coma Scale scores (P < .0001), indicating higher levels in more severe injuries. Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed that peak neuroglobin is a strong predictor of poor outcomes, with area under the curve of 0.89. CONCLUSION: Serum neuroglobin appears to be a promising early prognostic biomarker in pediatric patients with TBI. This preliminary study supports its potential role in early risk stratification. Its rapid rise with a peak at 24 hours postinjury, together with its association with 6-month functional outcomes, supports its potential role in early risk stratification and outcome prediction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saad et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: