Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates containment effectiveness in shared agent states, suggesting improved performance in dependency detection.
Version v0.2 of the empirical companion to Transitive Taint Propagation (TTP). This version extends the v0.1 Empirical Evaluation with the measured boundaries of the primitive's bounding levers: (1) the containment denial-of-service surface, with over-containment up to ~92% of the blast radius on a maximally-independent workload under taint-every-read; (2) a read-relevance content-derivation gate that raises blast-radius precision from ~34% to ~100% at zero recall loss when derivation is literally visible, with its paraphrase blind-spot reported as the published recall floor (~98% of true dependencies invisible at the zero-overlap extreme); (3) a no-false-negative (superset) guarantee for summarized containment, scoped to the recorded dependency graph; and (4) a provenance-summary structure that bounds write-side ancestor storage from O(n^2) to O(n) (n^1.00, r^2 = 1.000), trading only a tunable false-positive over-containment. The v0.1 core results (within-session containment recall, the cross-session recall-vs-carry soundness boundary, and the performance envelope) are carried forward so the latest version remains self-complete. Every figure is a seeded, oracle-scored median reported with its operating envelope and honest scope; each lever trades something measured and on the page. Reference-implementation results are reproducible from committed study runners. CC-BY-4.0.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andre Byrd (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: