Bench-Scale Comparison of UV Light-Emitting Diodes and 3D-Printed Photocatalysts for Water Treatment

Advanced oxidation processes using titanium dioxide (TiO2) have emerged as a promising approach for the photocatalytic degradation of contaminants in water and have drawn extensive research attention despite limited translation of this technology to large-scale applications. The limitations of this technology include immobilization of the photocatalyst, scalability, and compatibility with available light sources. Using 3D printing to immobilize TiO2-based photocatalysts, we systematically evaluated the rates of photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue (MB) with different light-emitting diode (LED) ultraviolet (UV) light sources and modified TiO2-based photocatalytic materials. The UV LED lights successfully decreased the MB concentrations with half-lives ranging from 0.9 to 2.4 h, with relative photocatalytic performance of UVA-365 > UVA-395 > UVC-280. The photocatalytic degradation rates under UV LEDs were slower (0.9–2.4 h) than those achieved using a low-pressure mercury UV-C lamp (0.5 h) and were also lower than those observed under solar simulated lights (0.6 h). The TiO2 modified by an alkyl silane entity and embedded in a polylactic acid polymeric system with 3D printing exhibited the fastest methylene blue (MB) removal among the three TiO2-based structures evaluated, with a half-life of 0.6 h compared to the 1.6–17.7 h for the other materials. This research demonstrated that 3D printing enables the integration of functionalized photocatalysts, and, when paired with low-cost, low-energy UV LED lights, can achieve environmentally relevant rates of performance. Ultimately, these findings represent an incremental step toward improving the performance of 3D-printed photocatalytic materials.