Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Investigates blood immune profiles as predictors of cervical cancer recurrence, suggesting new prognostic tools.
208 Background: The prognostic value of peripheral blood immunophenotyping for cervical cancer (CC) recurrence remains unclear. This study investigated associations between peripheral blood immune profiles and CC recurrence, developing a predictive model for progression-free survival (PFS). Methods: We analyzed cellular immunity, humoral immunity, and complete blood count (CBC) profiles in 667 CC patients post-primary therapy. A peripheral blood-derived test (PBDT) was developed using multivariate and LASSO Cox regression models to predict PFS. Model performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves and concordance index (C-index). Results: Among 667 patients, the recurrence group (n = 102) demonstrated significantly elevated B lymphocyte proportions ( P = 1.77e−12), complement C3 ( P = 0.04), complement C4 ( P = 3.14e−05), and immunoglobulin G levels ( P = 0.005), while Cytotoxic T cell proportions were reduced ( P = 0.015). The PBDT LASSO Cox model showed superior performance with higher C-index (0.81; 95% CI: 0.75-0.86) versus multivariate Cox regression (0.78; 95% CI: 0.72-0.84). In validation, the LASSO model achieved excellent discrimination for 1-year (AUC = 0.845; 95% CI: 0.727-0.963), 3-year (AUC = 0.782; 95% CI: 0.684-0.88), and 5-year PFS (AUC = 0.799; 95% CI: 0.699-0.898). Importantly, PBDT emerged as an independent recurrence predictor (HR = 6.62; 95% CI: 4.33-10.14, P = 3.19e−18), outperforming traditional clinical factors including age, radiation therapy, and FIGO stage. Conclusions: Peripheral blood immunophenotyping profiles strongly correlate with CC recurrence. The PBDT model represents a promising non-invasive prognostic tool for predicting CC recurrence, potentially enabling personalized risk stratification and treatment optimization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: