Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Narrative review evaluates how intestinal ultrasound improves treatment decisions in IBD, suggesting a shift towards precision medicine.
Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), including Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis, are characterized by marked heterogeneity, challenging disease monitoring and individualized treatment. Despite advances in treat-to-target strategies, unmet needs persist, particularly in assessing transmural healing and optimizing therapeutic decisions. This narrative review evaluates the role of intestinal ultrasound (IUS) as a key tool for precision medicine in IBD. IUS is a non-invasive, repeatable, and cost-effective imaging modality with diagnostic accuracy comparable to endoscopy and magnetic resonance enterography, with reported sensitivities and specificities frequently exceeding 80–90% for detecting active disease. It enables real-time assessment of transmural inflammation and complications, while parameters such as bowel wall thickness and Doppler vascularity support prognostic stratification. Early reductions in bowel wall thickness (≥25–30%) have been associated with improved treatment response, allowing identification of responders within weeks of therapy initiation. IUS informs therapeutic decision-making, including initiation, optimization, and de-escalation of advanced therapies, and may reduce reliance on invasive procedures. Integration into routine care has been associated with improved disease control and cost-effectiveness. Standardization of protocols, operator training, and prospective validation are required to establish IUS as a cornerstone of precision medicine in IBD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Clelia et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: