Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates a novel image-based method for estimating seeds in sunflower heads, suggesting enhanced accessibility.
Manually counting sunflower seeds on capitula is labor-intensive, requiring approximately one person-hour per head, and can be inconsistent for densely packed heads. Existing phenotyping approaches often depend on laboratory-based equipment, limiting their accessibility. In this study, we developed a benchtop image-based pipeline for rapid, non-destructive estimation of developed and aborted seeds on intact dried sunflower heads. A dataset of 1093 sunflower capitula was imaged under fixed indoor lighting, and individual seeds were annotated as developed or aborted. A YOLOv8m one-stage object detector was trained and evaluated using a counting-focused protocol, in which a single confidence threshold was selected on the validation set and then applied unchanged to an independent test set of 109 images. The baseline model was compared with recent YOLO variants and different augmentation strategies. On the test set, the model achieved a mean absolute count error of 61.3 seeds per image, a mean relative error of 12.0%, and an mAP50 of 0.18 at the locked confidence threshold of 0.15. Only 13.8% of test images had relative errors below 2%. Larger YOLO models and augmentation variants did not improve performance. These findings show that the proposed system provides approximate, non-destructive seed-count estimation under controlled imaging conditions, while highlighting the need for improved localization in dense regions and domain adaptation for fresh heads or field conditions. The annotated dataset and trained model weights are made available to support reproducible research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mume et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: