Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates improved grain quality and reduced arsenic in rice with selenium biofortification under water-saving irrigation, highlighting its potential for food safety.
Rice production is under increasing threat from adverse climatic trends that exacerbate water scarcity and compromise food safety. The need to transition toward water-saving irrigation is urgent, as is the requirement of addressing the dual burden of selenium (Se) deficiency and arsenic (As) toxicity. This 3-year field study (2020–2022) is the first to evaluate the effects of integrated water-saving irrigation. Permanent flood irrigation (Flood) or alternate wetting and drying was used, in which fields were reflooded when the soil matric potential reached −20 kPa (Reflood-20) and −70 kPa (Reflood-70); the effects of foliar Se biofortification at 15 g Se ha−1 with sodium selenate (15-Se) or no Se (No-Se) on rice production and Se and As accumulation were also investigated. The results identified the Reflood-20 regime as the optimal strategy, achieving 36% water savings without significant grain yield penalties while enhancing grain quality. Foliar Se application successfully increased the dehulled grain Se content by 10.7-fold, effectively meeting human dietary requirements. The As contents were decreased by 27.6% due to water restriction, and an additional 10% loss was observed because of Se supplementation. Analysis of the straw also showed a 23.5% decrease in As and a 5.7-fold increase in Se. Consequently, the synergy between moderate deficit irrigation and Se biofortification provides a robust, cost-effective framework for the large-scale production of safer, nutrient-dense rice, reconciling resource efficiency with food security.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Poblaciones et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: