Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates UniPhos Tip for deep phosphoproteomic profiling in low input samples, indicating improved efficiency.
Phosphoproteomics has emerged as a powerful strategy for dissecting oncogenic signaling networks and therapeutic response mechanisms in clinical research. However, its clinical application for low input samples often remains constrained by extensive multi-step sample handling, cumulative sample loss, and the large protein input requirements of conventional workflows. To address these limitations, we presented UniPhos Tip, an integrated 3-layer packing StageTip composed of Ni-NTA, C18, and SDB-XC that unifies phosphopeptide enrichment, desalting, and optional fractionation within a single device, completing the entire workflow within about 210 minutes. The UniPhos Tip employs a tandemly assembled resin architecture that eliminates inter-tube sample transfers, thereby reducing handling-induced loss and improving analytical robustness. Systematic optimization of washing sequence and fractionation strategy demonstrated that formic acid–based washing increased enrichment specificity from 88% to 96%. The strategy demonstrates robust phosphoproteomic depth under ultra-low input conditions, identifying 3,125 and 4,295 phosphopeptides from 5 µg and 25 µg of peptide inputs, respectively, with high quantitative reproducibility (Spearman ρ > 0.98). Application of the optimized workflow enabled comprehensive detection of phosphorylation sites across major oncogenic signaling cascades, including RTK-RAS-MAPK, PI3K-Akt-mTOR, and JAK-STAT pathways, demonstrating preservation of biologically and pharmacologically relevant network information from limited sample input. Together, UniPhos Tip provides a scalable and low-input–compatible solution for phosphoproteomic sample preparation, bridging workflow simplification with deep and reproducible phosphosite coverage for biologically and clinically relevant applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tai et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: