Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Examines AI's role in enhancing investment efficiency and reducing financial mismatches, indicating significant implications for capital allocation.
Purpose This study aims to examine whether the adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) can alleviate financial mismatches and enhance capital allocation efficiency through firms' investment decisions, particularly in the context of rapid digitalization and structural financial reforms. Design/methodology/approach The study develops a “technology–efficiency–allocation” analytical framework to explain how AI promotes investment efficiency and mitigates financial mismatches. Using the Skip-gram model in Word2vec, firm-level indicators of AI application are constructed to overcome the biases of patent-based or industry-level measures. Inefficient investment is introduced as an instrumental variable, and a double machine learning (DML) framework is employed to control for high-dimensional covariates and specification errors, ensuring credible causal identification. Findings The study develops a “technology–efficiency–allocation” analytical framework to explain how AI promotes investment efficiency and mitigates financial mismatches. Using the Skip-gram model in Word2vec, firm-level indicators of AI application are constructed to overcome the biases of patent-based or industry-level measures. Inefficient investment is introduced as an instrumental variable, and a DML framework is employed to control for high-dimensional covariates and specification errors, ensuring credible causal identification. Originality/value This study provides firm-level empirical evidence clarifying AI's role in reducing financial mismatches and improving capital allocation efficiency. It extends the literature by integrating advanced textual measurement of AI application with causal machine learning methods and offers practical implications for promoting technological integration and enhancing financial efficiency in emerging economies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: