Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Identifies prognostic markers in posterior fossa ependymoma group B, suggesting improved risk stratification.
Background Posterior fossa ependymoma can be classified into three distinct molecular types: PF-EPN-A, PF-EPN-B, and PF-EPN-SE. Characterization of PF-EPN-B has primarily focused on describing its molecular heterogeneity and identifying subtypes. PF-EPN-B is characterized by late relapses, without known risk markers to distinguish high- from low-risk cases. However, research focusing on identifying prognostic markers and characterizing this molecular type using high-resolution approaches such as single-nucleus RNA sequencing remains limited. Methods Using an updated cohort of 340 DNA methylation profiles, including 230 patients with available survival data and 16 single-nucleus RNA sequencing profiles, we performed an integrative analysis to identify prognostic markers and to discern the heterogeneity within PF-EPN-B at the single-cell level. Results Based on the DNA methylation data, we were able to identify the previously described subtypes 1-5, however, the clusters 1-3 exhibited less stable and less distinct features compared to clusters 4 and 5. Single-nucleus RNA sequencing of 82,000 cells revealed differences in immune infiltration and distinct immune cell-specific activated metaprograms across the subtypes. Training a linear support vector machine on the 10,000 most variable CpG sites allowed stratification into two risk groups with significantly different progression-free survival (median group 1: 56.6 months, median group 2: 165.0 months, p = 0.0026). Additionally, gain of chromosome 1q emerged as a potential negative prognostic marker for progression-free survival, with enrichment in subtype 1. Conclusion PF-EPN-B exhibits substantial heterogeneity in both copy number alteration profiles and gene expression patterns across its subtypes. The identification of chromosome 1q gain as a possible prognostic marker and differences in immune infiltration between the subtypes may enable improved risk stratification and support the development of more precise, patient-tailored therapeutic strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Böning et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: