Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective analysis develops a multisource method to identify behavioral health crises in Medicaid beneficiaries, suggesting improved crisis surveillance.
OBJECTIVE: The authors aimed to assess the adequacy of traditional billing codes for capturing behavioral health crisis events and to develop a comprehensive claims-based methodology for identifying such events among Medicaid beneficiaries. METHODS: In this retrospective analysis of Medicaid claims data collected from 2016 to 2021, the authors conducted a five-step, multisource approach that incorporated traditional crisis service codes, behavioral health-related encounters in emergency department and urgent care settings, diagnosis codes indicating suicide attempts or intentional self-harm, naloxone administration, and emergency procedures associated with behavioral health diagnoses. Diagnosis, service, and place-of-service indicators were used to identify crisis service events beyond those captured by traditional billing codes. RESULTS: In 2021, traditional crisis billing codes identified 645,940 beneficiaries compared with >2.3 million identified with the expanded approach, capturing <28% of individuals experiencing a behavioral health crisis. From 2016 to 2021, the rate of individuals experiencing a crisis service event increased by 6.6% (from 31.8 to 33.9 per 1,000 beneficiaries), with the largest increases observed for naloxone administration (50.0%) and suicide attempt or self-harm events (14.8%). Compared with traditional codes, the expanded method identified a higher proportion of rural residents, older individuals, and individuals without a formal behavioral health diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Reliance on traditional crisis billing codes was found to significantly underestimate the true burden of behavioral health crises among Medicaid populations. A multisource approach incorporating diagnosis, service, and place-of-service indicators provides a more accurate and inclusive framework for crisis surveillance, with important implications for evaluating and strengthening behavioral health crisis systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karakus et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: