Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Review examines transparent soil application in geotechnical engineering, highlighting its benefits and limitations.
Transparent soil technology provides a non-invasive experimental approach for visualizing internal processes in geotechnical infrastructure systems, where soil deformation, seepage, erosion, and failure evolution are often difficult to observe using conventional model tests. This review examines the material systems and applicability of transparent soil with emphasis on infrastructure-related applications, including foundation engineering, underground construction, seepage and grouting, internal erosion, slope failure, disaster mitigation, and thermal monitoring. The discussion focuses on transparent sand and transparent clay, comparing their engineering relevance, typical application scenarios, and main limitations rather than treating transparency as the sole criterion for material selection. Based on the reviewed studies, a four-dimensional applicability framework is proposed, consisting of mechanical similarity, optical measurability, system compatibility, and scenario matching. This framework is used to clarify how transparent soil can support mechanism interpretation, model calibration, and scheme comparison in infrastructure-related geotechnical experiments. The review indicates that transparent soil is particularly useful for revealing displacement fields, flow paths, localized deformation, and progressive failure processes in foundations, tunnels, slopes, and other geotechnical systems. However, direct extrapolation of model test results to engineering design parameters remains constrained by material equivalence, optical measurement conditions, model scale, and similarity calibration. Overall, the proposed framework and synthesis provide a systematic reference for transparent soil material selection, infrastructure-oriented scenario matching, and the assessment of applicability boundaries in transparent soil model tests.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: