Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Benchmarks a workflow to model oxygen chemical potentials in oxide synthesis atmospheres, guiding future experiments.
Connecting 0 K density functional theory (DFT) energies to finite-temperature, finite-pressure synthesis conditions is a well-established thermodynamic formalism, yet quantified guidance on when and how to accurately calibrate these results to experimental chemical potentials in practice remains sparse. In this work, we systematically benchmark a complete workflow─the virtual furnace─that constructs effective oxygen chemical potentials (μ O2 ) for common synthesis atmospheres (air, Ar, H 2, CO) as functions of temperature and partial pressure and propagates quantified errors from formation enthalpies through reaction energies to critical chemical potentials. Applying this workflow to 11 binary oxides, we find that “gas-only” thermal corrections are sufficient at low temperatures and for Group II oxides across all temperatures, while solid-phase vibrational contributions become critical at elevated temperatures for transition metal oxides. We quantify this threshold through the ratio |Δ S solid /Δ S total | as a practical guide for when phonon calculations are warranted. Predicted critical reduction temperatures and oxygen chemical potentials show strong agreement with industrial practice and experimental data, with typical errors of 150–250 °C for most oxides. This benchmarked workflow provides practitioners with explicit, quantified guidance for predictive modeling of phase stability and synthesis condition design.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Walters et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: