Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Measures urinary THC-COOH without isotope-labeled standards, suggesting a reliable alternative in forensic analysis.
Quantitative determination of 11-nor-9-carboxy-Δ 9 -tetrahydrocannabinol (THC–COOH) in urine is the internationally accepted approach for verifying cannabis use in forensic toxicology. Accurate liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) analysis typically relies on stable isotope-labeled internal standards; however, isotope-labeled cannabinoid reference materials are costly, tightly regulated, and not uniformly accessible across laboratories. We report an isotope-coded derivatization (ICD) strategy that enables isotope-dilution–equivalent quantification of urinary THC–COOH without reliance on commercially available isotope-labeled cannabinoid standards. THC–COOH was derivatized with isopropyl-piperidine carboxylic acid hydrazide (IPPAH) and its deuterated analogue (IPPAH- d 6 ), generating a chemically matched analyte/internal standard pair through parallel derivatization. The derivatives exhibited stable chromatographic coelution and closely matched ionization behavior under positive electrospray ionization. Quantitative LC–MS/MS analysis demonstrated linearity over 1–500 ng/mL (r 2 > 0.999), with intra- and interday accuracy of 81.8–108.6% and precision below 10%. Internal standard–normalized matrix factors ranged from 97–109% with minimal variability, indicating effective compensation for matrix effects. This compensation enabled reliable quantification without extensive sample cleanup, allowing a simplified sample preparation workflow compared with conventional methods. Derivatized samples remained stable for at least 72 h in the autosampler without detectable isotopic exchange. This ICD strategy provides a quantitatively reliable alternative to conventional isotope dilution while eliminating dependence on isotope-labeled cannabinoid standards, thereby expanding the accessibility of high-confidence LC–MS/MS quantification and illustrating the broader potential of isotope-coded derivatization in forensic mass spectrometry.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kusano et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: