Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates safety and recommended dose of vinblastine and tovorafenib in young patients, indicating manageable toxicity and potential effectiveness.
Background The VICTORY study comprises dose-finding (Phase A) and expansion (Phase B) phases. Phase A was designed to determine the RP2D of vinblastine combined with tovorafenib, a selective, CNS-penetrant, type II RAF inhibitor. Methods Eligible patients were <25 years of age with recurrent or progressive pLGG with confirmed BRAF/CRAF alterations, having received at least one prior line of systemic chemotherapy and/or targeted therapy. Phase A used a rolling six design with a 28-day dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) assessment period, across five planned dose levels, starting at dose level 0 (weekly vinblastine 4 mg/m² and tovorafenib 420 mg/m²), Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and preliminary anti-tumor activity were assessed. Results Between March 2024 and July 2025, 11 patients were enrolled on phase A : 3 at dose level 0, 2 at dose level −1, and 6 at dose level −2. Median age was 7.8 years (range 2.25–14.3). Ten patients had BRAF fusions and one had a BRAF V600E mutation. Median number of prior systemic therapies was three (range 1–4), with 9/11 previously treated with BRAF and/or MEK inhibitors. Six patients experienced eight DLTs, including neutropenia (n = 4), grade 3 maculopapular rash (n = 3), and grade 3 ALT elevation (n = 1). At data cutoff (October 2025), all patients remained on combination therapy except one continuing tovorafenib monotherapy. The RP2D was vinblastine 2 mg/m² and tovorafenib 380 mg/m². Vinblastine PK did not show trend of dose proportionality likely due to sample size and data variability, while tovorafenib exposure was consistent with tovorafenib monotherapy PK. With a median follow-up of 10 months, best responses included partial response (n = 2), minor response (n = 4), and stable disease (n = 4). Conclusions The vinblastine–tovorafenib combination demonstrates manageable toxicity and encouraging anti-tumor activity in a heavily pretreated pLGG population. Phase B is ongoing to further evaluate efficacy and durability of response.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thacker et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: