Preprint introduces a method to evaluate corporate sustainability disclosures using scoring axes and AI consensus.
This preprint documents a disclosure-based research method for measuring the maturity of non-financial evidence infrastructure in corporate sustainability disclosures. The framework introduces two scoring axes — N4 (Business-Environment Integration) and N5 (Governance Integration, 0–5) — alongside ΔN (year-over-year score difference), four regression type classifications (Target Retreat, Governance Retreat, Narrative Retreat, Broad Deterioration), and a multi-provider LLM consensus scoring pipeline using four major AI providers. A six-firm FY2025–FY2026 pilot on Japanese listed companies validates the pipeline and illustrates the source-mismatch failure mode that makes ΔN uninterpretable when the underlying document type changes between years. The purpose of this note is to document the research methodology transparently and to provide a reproducible, citable reference in the domain of AI-assisted sustainability disclosure evaluation. The method is disclosure-based and does not depend on any specific company, product, patent, or proprietary system.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hiroyuki Kokubu (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: