This study examines the impact of ESG disclosure, leverage, and profitability on firm value, measured by Tobin’s Q, among 67 non-financial Tadawul-listed companies in Saudi Arabia over the period 2015–2024. ESG disclosure is captured through a manual content-analysis index that scores the proportion of expected environmental, social, and governance items reported by each firm. The study further investigates whether board independence moderates these relationships while controlling for liquidity, firm size, current ratio, capital expenditure, and board size. Methodologically, the study employs the two-step system generalized method of moments (system GMM) estimator, which addresses dynamic persistence, endogeneity, and unobserved heterogeneity. The findings reveal that ESG disclosure has a positive and significant effect on firm value, indicating that the Saudi market increasingly rewards firms that provide broader sustainability-related information. Profitability also exerts a positive influence on Tobin’s Q, while leverage has a negative and significant effect, suggesting that higher debt weakens market valuation. Among the moderating effects, board independence significantly reduces the negative impact of leverage on firm value, although it does not significantly strengthen the positive ESG disclosure–firm value relationship. The results also show that liquidity, firm size, capital expenditure, and board size positively influence firm value. The study’s novelty lies in being the first, to our knowledge, to integrate ESG disclosure, financial structure, profitability, and board independence within a single dynamic firm-value framework over a decade-long panel that brackets the Saudi Exchange’s 2021 ESG disclosure guideline. In doing so, it advances emerging-market ESG research by showing that, under Saudi Arabia’s largely voluntary disclosure regime and concentrated-ownership structure, board independence operates primarily as a risk-monitoring mechanism rather than as an amplifier of disclosure value. The findings imply that regulators should strengthen and progressively mandate ESG reporting frameworks, that investors should treat ESG transparency as value-relevant information, and that firms should view ESG transparency and prudent governance as strategic tools for enhancing market value in line with Vision 2030.
Belouadah et al. (Tue,) studied this question.