Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-sectional study examines the link between hamstring flexibility and strength ratios in players with prior injuries, suggesting implications for training.
Background Recurrent hamstring strain injuries are associated with deficits in eccentric strength and altered muscle-tendon extensibility, which may persist and contribute to reinjury risk. Objective To examine the relationship between hamstring flexibility, assessed by Askling H-test, and isokinetic strength ratios; concentric-to-eccentric (Con:Ecc) and hamstring-to-quadriceps (H:Q) in elite soccer players with previous hamstring strain. Methods Fifty-two male professional players (27 ± 5 years) with clinically confirmed prior hamstring injury completed the Askling H-test and bilateral isokinetic testing at 60°·s⁻ 1 (concentric) and 180°·s⁻ 1 (eccentric). The mean of three maximal efforts was used to calculate peak torques. Pearson correlations and multiple linear regression examined the relationship between flexibility, age, and strength ratios (α = 0.05). Results Mean ± SD Con:Ecc ratio was 86 ± 9% and H:Q ratio 63 ± 7%. Hamstring flexibility correlated inversely with the Con:Ecc ratio, moderately in the dominant limb ( r = -0.65 [95% CI −0.78 to −0.46], p < 0.001) and weakly in the non-dominant limb ( r = –0.34 [95% CI −0.56 to −0.06], p = 0.02). No significant correlation was observed between flexibility and the H:Q ratio ( p = 0.38). Flexibility remained an independent predictor of the Con:Ecc ratio after adjusting for age (β = –0.61, p < 0.001; R 2 = 0.38). Conclusions Reduced hamstring flexibility is associated with a higher Con:Ecc ratio, indicating relatively reduced eccentric capacity, but is not related to H:Q balance. These findings highlight the role of flexibility in hamstring strength balance and warrant longitudinal investigation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Takla et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: