Systematic literature review identifies key factors influencing AI adoption in organizations, suggesting pathways for integration.
Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) adoption is increasingly reported as a priority for organizations, yet they face a growing, fragmented body of evidence concerning the factors that influence successful AI integration. Method: To identify the relevant factors for organizational AI adoption, we conducted a systematic literature review (SLR) following PRISMA guidelines, which yielded 37 quantitative empirical studies. From these studies we extracted 1229 paper-item instances, of which 810 were retained after applying structured exclusion criteria to develop a domain model relevant to organizational AI adoption. The model’s content validity was assessed and supported through expert feedback using the Content Validity Index (CVI) methodology. Results: We organized 24 subclusters into nine main clusters across the three dimensions Technology (Enablers, Usability, Trust), Organization (Leadership, People, Process), and Environment (Market, Regulatory, Partner). Our analysis suggests that workforce skills, perceived intelligence, and resources are among the most frequently studied and positively associated antecedents of AI adoption, and that constructs related to AI explainability and control (human-in-the-loop oversight) have received little research attention and remain underrepresented despite growing regulatory requirements such as the EU AI Act. Conclusions: The resulting domain model provides an empirically grounded classification of organizational AI adoption factors and can serve as a foundation for future measurement instruments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Geppert et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: